πŸ’­ Critical evaluation of biological research

Fun, fun, fun! Biological research is presented in roughly the following format: title, abstract (summary), introduction, methods, results, discussion (+ conclusion, references, other notes, appendices if applicable). Citations should be present throughout as necessary.


It’s useful to actually be involved in the experimentation, analysis of data and writing of these papers in order to understand how they are written, why and for whom.


In critiquing these often technical and information-dense reports, a stepwise approach is essential. Often, there is a specific reason each paper is consulted. Sometimes it is for a specific methods section line on the recipe of a buffer. Sometimes it is to get a broad understanding of an area, in which case the abstract and introduction are useful. Other times, it is to get to the point and see whether the experiment produced the expected results, in which case one’s eyes would hover over the results, discussion and conclusion sections.


As such, each section has different writing and formatting rules. Methods must be objective, quantitative and thorough, as to allow a separate person to replicate them. The introduction must be exhaustive, cursive and even narrative. The discussion must tread the fine line between referring to the results conservatively while speculating over their implications, given the existing…

πŸ† Read 500+ topics for all 6 UK exam boards πŸ†

πŸ“ Enter now to claim your FREE 3-day trial and find answers to all your revision topicsΒ πŸ“

βœ”οΈ Just Β£3.49/month after that. Cancel anytimeΒ βœ”οΈ

You explain everything so simply!Β πŸ™‚Β -SecretDuck on The Student Room